Assigning Blame: Is it my SEO software or is it Google?

I admit. Prior to learning about SEO apps and website marketing trade, I thought Google was the best thing ever. I Used Google to look for anything from celebrities, to visuals, to news stories to strange things and heedlessly trusted the results. Then I heard about SEO software and a new e-commerce dedicated to website marketing, and my convictions were never the same. But even before my revelation, after doing some philosophical musings, I got a feeling that search engines, Google to boot, know far from all, and pass on to the web community even less than that.

My Google travails soon convinced me that Flikr is a better image data bank, that with the help of feeds I can access nice current events stories without having to rummage through Google search findings (rummaging seems more fitting than Google search), and human search is best managed by Facebook. It seems like whenever I search for weird objects on Google, the results are almost always inaccurate, to put it kindly. Try searching for SEO products and other SEO related topics on Google and you are just about prepared to lose your self-control. I mean, come on, what’s the connection between SEO applications and online education sites or online casinos? Gladly, in my disappointment.

So when news of seo software review and the whole industry revolving around it came into my humble worldview, my doubts about things popping up on the top of Google grew exponentially. Do they deserve to be there and whose fault is it, Google or site promoters using SEO tools. The moral quandary is huge. Do I stop using my SEO google ranking or do I stop using Google instead? I resolved that I can’t boycott Google just yet. At least not until the worthy rival enters the picture. For now I will keep juggling between Blekko, Google and the above methods to complement the SERP mess that Google is. And, oh,yes, I will continue using my SEO applications.

Frankly, SEO applications is the reason why folks like me get found on the net. smart as they are, search engine web crawlers are unlikely to find some no-name guy and rank his webpage highly. In this respect, I am a steadfast fan of SEO applications and non-paid search. If it was all about the paid search, the Fortune businesses would squish me before I knew it. And there are hundreds of powerbrands on the Fortune list! But here is something else that irritates me and other backlink checker users, I am sure. There are individuals who buy SEO software products and use them to sell dresseson casino sites and such. What we have is junk that not only lives on the net but is also highly ranked by search engines.

What is the public reaction to this? They Google SEO app reviews and will instead find junk content. They get disillusioned. So much for the “Internet equality”. Does this indicate that SEO product and service field is harmful? I don’t think so.

The abusers of SEO apps have to stop corrupting the Internet but it’s like asking hackers to stop cracking the code. The bad side about it is that black hat SEOs are abusing the prospect to be noticeable on the Net that is given to the random dude like me. For now people just have to tolerate them. One can only wish that Google will put more emphasis on spotting the schemers unethically using SEO applications, and if Google doesn’t, the big search engine will.

Tags: , , , ,